Skip to main content
· 2/18/1986

In the Matter of Leland G. Schmaling and Mary F. Schmaling, Debtors. Appeal of Esther J. Schmaling, Leland G. Schmaling and Mary F. Schmaling

Citations

  • 783 F.2d 680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the security agreement in that case did not cover proceeds, but stating that government entitlements are proceeds where crops were actually planted
  • concluding that the security agreement in that case did not cover proceeds, but stating that government entitlements are proceeds where crops were actually planted
  • farmer entered PIK program after granting bank a security interest in crops

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.