· 2/18/1986
In the Matter of Leland G. Schmaling and Mary F. Schmaling, Debtors. Appeal of Esther J. Schmaling, Leland G. Schmaling and Mary F. Schmaling
Citations
- 783 F.2d 680
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the security agreement in that case did not cover proceeds, but stating that government entitlements are proceeds where crops were actually planted
- concluding that the security agreement in that case did not cover proceeds, but stating that government entitlements are proceeds where crops were actually planted
- farmer entered PIK program after granting bank a security interest in crops
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.