In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Claussen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney did not violate former DR 1-102(A)(3) when “his legal research gave him some basis for making the representation”
• “Although in hindsight, the accused’s opinion may be incorrect, his legal research gave him some basis for making the representation.”
• “The facts are capable of supporting either party’s view, but the evidence in the record does not permit us to infer that the alleged violations are ‘highly probable.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).