Supreme Court of Vermont· 8/9/1991
In re Ladd
Citations
- 157 Vt. 270
- 596 A.2d 1313
- 1991 Vt. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that while “legal questions about the computation of petitioner’s sentence are for the demanding state to resolve,” we will examine evidence submitted for sufficiency
- observing that “[b]y any measure, the document is insufficient to show that petitioner’s sentence was unexpired at the time of the conduct that gave rise to the extradition request”
- reversing superior court’s order denying writ of habeas corpus in case involving governor’s warrant extradition
- once State puts into evidence supporting documents, defendant may present evidence to rebut prima facie case
- “[T]he demanding state must establish . . . [that petitioner] has broken the terms of his or her probation or parolef] and [that] the sentence had not expired at the time of the alleged violation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Gibson, Johnson, Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court· 1978-12-18· cited 640×
- In Re HvalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-11-05· cited 13×
- In Re MoskalukSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-05· cited 13×
- In Re GrazianiSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-05· cited 10×
- Ingram v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia· 1979-05-31· cited 6×
- Potts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-10-16· cited 4×
- Sloss v. Sheriff of Leavenworth CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1982-07-15· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. Doherty v. DugganSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-06-07· cited 2×
- Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1979-12-21· cited 2×
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.