Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/5/1991
In Re Moskaluk
Citations
- 591 A.2d 95
- 156 Vt. 294
- 1991 Vt. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that § 4943(b) does not require that documents show probable cause to believe that fugitive violated probation
- ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim will not be considered on direct appeal absent trial court record upon which claim can be judged
- ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim will not be considered on direct appeal absent trial court record upon which claim can be judged
- judgment of conviction establishes factual basis for the extraditable crime and no additional findings required to establish parole or probation violation
- no requirement that documents show probable cause to believe that fugitive violated his probation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 1,205×
- State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-02-17· cited 74×
- State v. LundSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-16· cited 17×
- Kirkland v. KolodziejSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-07-17· cited 10×
- People ex rel. Schank v. GeraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-07-03· cited 9×
- In re LaddSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-08-09· cited 5×
- State v. SamuelsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2005-01-27
- In re JonesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-11-02
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 142×
- State v. DavignonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-16· cited 25×
- People v. CoyleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-11-22· cited 18×
- State v. GabareeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-15· cited 18×
- Ex Parte BrittonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-10-07· cited 17×
- In Re HvalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-11-05· cited 13×
- Lovejoy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-07-10· cited 13×
- In Re EverettSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-02-03· cited 7×
- Application of KirkCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-09-20· cited 5×
- Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1967-04-04· cited 5×
- In Re RoesselSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-06-06· cited 5×
- Russell v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont· 1968-08-19· cited 5×
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-05· cited 4×
- Richardson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1966-05-27· cited 3×
- In re RoppSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-22· cited 3×
- In re HvalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-11· cited 2×
- In re HaynesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-10-05· cited 2×
- Woodard v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-05-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.