Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 5/14/2014

In re Kyle

Citations

  • 510 B.R. 804
  • 2014 WL 1931608
  • 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 2159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ajpplying the Amended Homestead Exemption to bankruptcy cases filed after its effective date is, in fact, a prospective application of the amendment.” (citing In re Pursley, 2014 WL 293557, at (Bankr.N.D.Ohio Jan. 23, 2014)
  • “Inconsistent state laws are preempted by conflicting Bankruptcy Code provisions.” (citing Patriot Portfolio, LLC v. Weinstein (In re Weinstein), 164 F.3d 677, 682-83 (1st Cir. 1999))
  • “[B]oth the Bankruptcy Code and Ohio Exemption Statute point to the bankruptcy petition filing date as the crucial date for determining a debt- or’s entitlement to specific exemptions, including the homestead exemption, and the appropriate amount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.