Skip to main content
· 9/7/1983

In Re Lamar Barclay Pine, Sr., and Shirlene Tucker Pine, Debtors. Melvin Giles and Wanda Giles, Debtors v. Credithrift of America, Inc.

Citations

  • 717 F.2d 281
  • 9 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 271
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24182
  • 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[S]ection 522(f) cannot be utilized independently of Sec. 522(b); the debtors may avoid liens only on that property which the states have declared to be exempt.\
  • Congress expressed preference for state control of exemptions by enacting the \opt-out\ provision without limitation; therefore, it is doubtful that Congress intended section 522(f) to limit the kind of property states could define as exempt
  • Congress expressed preference for state control of exemptions by enacting the “opt-out” provision without limitation; therefore, it is doubtful that Congress intended section 522(f) to limit the kind of property states could define as exempt
  • Memorandum Decision, for publication, filed September 7, 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Kennedy, Weick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.