In Re Kucharz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 22 that unemployment compensation is not excluded from current 23 monthly income, and noting that § 101(10A)(B) “is ambiguous on 24 its face, as it is amenable to two conflicting interpretations”
• holding 22 that unemployment compensation is not excluded from current 23 monthly income, and noting that § 101(10A)(B) “is ambiguous on 24 its face, as it is amenable to two conflicting interpretations”
• “Whether unemployment insurance payments are ‘benefits received under the Social Security Act’ is a surprisingly difficult question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).