unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,698 Juvena Jenkins v. William M. Bowling, Director, Illinois Department of Labor, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the 20 postponement of unemployment benefits under section 602 B of the Illinois act is contrary to 21 sections 303(a)(1) and (3) of the Social Security Act and therefore invalid under the Supremacy 22 clause”
• stating that \the state has a legitimate interest in enforcing its valid eligibility criteria\
• acknowledging “the state’s competing interest in enforcing its eligibility criteria, the validity of which is not questioned”
• ordering the district court to enjoin the IUIA provision at issue but to do so in a judgment that \does not specify the exact measures that the state must take to bring itself into compliance with the law\
• ordering the district court to enjoin the IUIA provision at issue but to do so in a judgment that “does not specify the exact measures that the state must take to bring itself into compliance with the law”
• \We think Congress had larger objects in view than the ministerial competence of state comptrollers.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).