In re K.S.

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 6863

Syllabus

CHILDREN – CUSTODY – JUV.R. 40 – SHARED PARENTING: The juvenile court did not err in refusing to hear additional evidence under Juv.R. 40(D)(4)(d) where mother anticipated changes to the parties' work schedules and presented evidence of the changes before the magistrate. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in adopting father's proposed shared-parenting plan where competent, credible evidence supported the court's determination that it was in the best interest of the child to spend as much time as possible with both parents.