Skip to main content

In re J.L.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2885

Syllabus

TEMPORARY CUSTODY – CHILDREN – DUE PROCESS – R.C. 2151.419 – R.C. 2151.353 – JUV.R. 40: The juvenile court did not deprive parents of their fundamental right to raise their children when it granted temporary custody to the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services (\HCJFS\) and the record included some evidence that this disposition furthered the welfare of the children. The juvenile court did not err by finding that HCJFS made reasonable efforts towards reunification where HCJFS's case plans intended to address the concerns that justified removal of the children from the parents' custody. The juvenile court did not violate Juv.R. 40(D)(4)(d) when it refused to hear evidence of communications that occurred between counsel that arose between the filing of the objections to the magistrate's decision and the hearing on those objections.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.