In re O.G.H.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1555
Syllabus
CHILDREN – CUSTODY – SHARED PARENTING – R.C. 3109.04: The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by ordering shared parenting when it conducted a thorough analysis under R.C. 3109.04, concluding that shared parenting between Mother and Father was in the best interest of the child. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in ruling on the division of child care expenses even though neither party presented evidence of income. The juvenile court did not err when, in ordering shared parenting, it asked Father to clarify his testimony from the magistrate's hearing. The juvenile court lacked the discretion to sua sponte modify or amend the shared parenting plan.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.