Indiana Supreme Court· 3/24/2004
In Re Kendall
Citations
- 804 N.E.2d 1152
- 2004 Ind. LEXIS 296
- 2004 WL 575106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting lawyer’s argument that modification of Rules regarding flat fees should be “undertaken only as part of our rulemaking process, with extensive input from the public and the bar, rather than in this case.”
- advance payments for future services are by definition refundable; therefore, agreement characterizing advance payment as nonrefundable violated reasonableness requirement of Rule 1.5(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-29· cited 32×
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-07-26· cited 16×
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. EarhartKentucky Supreme Court· 2012-02-23· cited 8×
- In Re O'FarrellIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-02-11· cited 7×
- In re EarhartIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-11-22· cited 2×
- In re the Suspension of JosephSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-02-11· cited 1×
- In Re FreemanIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-10-17
- State, ex rel. Roseland v. HeraufNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-07-26
- In re CanadaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-04-26
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. HarrisWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2025-03-21
- IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF HARDEEP SULLNevada Supreme Court· 2025-08-28
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of GrimmIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 19×
- Matter of StantonIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 18×
- Matter of ThonertIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-07-03· cited 10×
- In Re WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-03-19· cited 9×
- In Re PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 4×
- Matter of KnobelIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-10-02· cited 3×
- In re StantonIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3×
- In Re McCartyIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.