In Re Kendall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting lawyer’s argument that modification of Rules regarding flat fees should be “undertaken only as part of our rulemaking process, with extensive input from the public and the bar, rather than in this case.”
• advance payments for future services are by definition refundable; therefore, agreement characterizing advance payment as nonrefundable violated reasonableness requirement of Rule 1.5(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).