Indiana Supreme Court· 2/11/2011
In Re O'Farrell
Citations
- 942 N.E.2d 799
- 2011 Ind. LEXIS 72
- 2011 WL 864498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- record insufficient to prove that some amount of flat fee was unearned when the attorney-client relationship ended before work was completed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, David, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. EarhartKentucky Supreme Court· 2012-02-23· cited 8×
- In the Matter of Everett E. Powell, IIIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-09-29· cited 5×
- In the Matter of Justin R. WallIndiana Supreme Court· 2017-05-03· cited 3×
- In re EarhartIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-11-22· cited 2×
- In re O'FarrellS.D. Indiana· 2013-08-21· cited 1×
- In re CanadaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-04-26
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-03-17· cited 127×
- Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 47×
- In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 41×
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. FrerichsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-11-13· cited 41×
- In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-05-22· cited 33×
- In Re KendallIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-03-24· cited 12×
- Jennings v. BackmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-04-10· cited 11×
- Matter of ThonertIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-07-03· cited 10×
- In the Matter of WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-02-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.