Skip to main content
· 9/18/1989

In Re Justice Hill

Citations

  • 568 A.2d 361
  • 152 Vt. 548
  • 1989 Vt. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “tough questioning” of lawyers during oral argument in Supreme Court not a violation of Canon 3A(3)
  • evidence of judicial misconduct must be clear and convincing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dooley, Barney, Keyser, Springer, Ellison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.