McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court considered in mitigation judge’s “commitment to fairness and innovative procedural reform”
• court considered in mitigation judge's \commitment to fairness and innovative procedural reform\
• “As matters of discovery are generally within the sound discretion of the initial trier of fact... we consider that the determination as to whether a discovery order shall issue is within the sound discretion of the Commission.”
• “[N]oticé< to the judge under investigation as to the nature of the complaints against him is not compelled as a matter of due process, ... Hence, relief from the deleterious effect, if any, of the Commission’s failure to follow rule 904(b
• location of hearings into alleged judicial misconduct is discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).