In re J.R.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2271
Syllabus
Juvenile court complied with Juv.R. 29(D) in accepting juvenile's admission to rape with serious-youthful-offender disposition where court personally addressed juvenile, explained consequences, used age-appropriate language, and engaged beyond yes-no questions. Court need not explain specific serious-youthful-offender procedural protections. Trial counsel was not ineffective where counsel actively participated in proceedings, obtained evaluations, and made strategic decisions about presenting mitigating youth factors.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 3,280×
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 2,193×
- State v. NicholasOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-02· cited 27×
- State v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-06· cited 10×
- State v. HawksOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-21· cited 2×
- State v. SpainOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.