In re Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “wages deposited into a judgment debtor’s bank account lose their character as wages for purposes of the New Mexico garnishment statute. As funds on deposit, they are only subject to the general property exemptions under New Mexico law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Kokoszka v. Belford
  Supreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 610×
• State v. Rivera
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-12-02· cited 207×
• State v. Jonathan M.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-05-08· cited 87×
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Canfield
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-06-23· cited 84×
• Whitely v. New Mexico State Personnel Board
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 61×
• Griego v. Oliver
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 57×
• Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1998-03-18· cited 44×
• In Re Portal
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-04-08· cited 23×
• Riendeau v. Canney (In Re Riendeau)
  D. Vermont· 2002-10-11· cited 19×
• In Re Thum
  C.D. Illinois· 2005-06-28· cited 16×
• In Re Urban
  D. Kansas· 2001-05-30· cited 14×
• In Re Adcock
  D. Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 11×
• Yaden v. Robinson (In Re Robinson)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-11-02· cited 11×
• In Re Jones
  S.D. Ohio· 2005-01-07· cited 8×
• In Re Doughman
  D. Kansas· 1999-07-16· cited 7×
• State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Maurice H.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2014-09-18· cited 7×
• In Re Channon
  D. New Mexico· 2010-02-24· cited 6×
• In re Foster
  E.D. Virginia· 2016-08-12· cited 6×
• In Re Resler
  D. Kansas· 2002-08-19· cited 5×
• In Re Haraughty
  S.D. Indiana· 2009-04-01· cited 5×