Yaden v. Robinson (In Re Robinson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Supreme Court’s conclusions regarding Congressional intent with the CCPA has no bearing on the Oregon legislature’s intent when enacting its state garnishment statute
• holding that Oregon has plenary authority over its own law of exemptions and, consequently, the Supreme Court’s conclusions regarding Congressional intent with the CCPA has no bearing on the Oregon legislature’s intent when enacting its state garnishment statute
• relying on context and assembling a “three-piece puzzle” of three different Oregon statutes to determine whether one of them provides for a particular exemption
• Oregon legislature asserted, a clear intent to retain some exempt status in the debtor's wages even though Oregon gar nishment statute was silent about whether it constituted an exemption
• Oregon garnishment statute provides debtors in bankruptcy with an exemption in wages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).