Skip to main content

In Re Johnson

Citations

  • 471 P.2d 269
  • 106 Ariz. 73
  • 1970 Ariz. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a lawyer who had been charged with assault did not violate the parallel Arizona disciplinary rule; incident was isolated, not involving a fixed pattern of misbehavior, and did not involve moral turpitude
  • holding that a lawyer who had been charged with assault did not violate the parallel Arizona disciplinary rule; incident was isolated, not involving a fixed pattern of misbehavior, and did not involve moral turpitude
  • “Isolated, trivial incidents of [assault] not involving a fixed pattern of misbehavior find ample redress in the criminal and civil laws.... [Such incidents arise] out of the infirmities of human nature. They are not the appropriate subject matter of a solemn reprimand by this Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockwood, Struckmeyer, Udall, McFarland, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.