Skip to main content
· 7/12/1996

In re Blase

Citations

  • 260 Kan. 351
  • 920 P.2d 931
  • 1996 Kan. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a mortgage containing a nonsensical addition designation did not provide constructive notice to subsequent judgment creditors because it was impossible to tell from the face of the mortgage whether the legal description misstated the plat, block, or addition
  • the description failed to indicate “the particulars wherein it was defective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott, Lockett, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.