In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the plain meaning of “recommend” under a supreme court rule in a disciplinary proceeding
• respondent argued that he had merely been negligent; we found knowing misrepresentation in violation of DR 1-201(A)(4)
• respondent argued that he had merely been negligent; we found knowing misrepresentation in violation of DR 1-201(A)(4)
• both holding an attorney may not ethically advance living expenses to a client
• both holding an attorney may not ethically advance living 10 expenses to a client
• both holding an 13 attorney may not ethically advance living expenses to a client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).