Skip to main content

In re J.G.

Citations

  • 495 S.W.3d 354
  • 2016 WL 2587118
  • 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 4750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that four-month period of time between State’s initial petition and filing of petition to transfer was not unreasonable delay and satisfied due-diligence element of Section 54.02(j)
  • holding juvenile court did not abuse discretion in waiving jurisdiction and entering second transfer order where sufficient evidence supported juvenile court’s challenged 52.04(j) findings
  • holding juvenile court did not abuse discretion in waiving jurisdiction and entering second transfer order where sufficient evidence supported juvenile court’s challenged 52.04(j) findings
  • affirming due diligence finding where second transfer hearing was held eight months after remand
  • affirming due diligence finding where second transfer hearing was held eight months after remand
  • where statute permitted procedure, fact that State followed procedure could not be evidence of lack of due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higley, Keyes, Rádack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.