Skip to main content

In re A.F.

Citations

  • 895 S.W.2d 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There appears to be no authority limiting the content of reports envisioned by section 54.04(b).”
  • one of the elements the trial court considers in determining whether to grant a motion to reopen is whether the moving party showed due diligence in obtaining the evidence
  • “The jury charge addressed appellant’s involvement in the alleged delinquent conduct only as a party and did not provide for a finding that appellant personally used or exhibited a deadly weapon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidd, Powers, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.