In Re Jelinek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prohibiting a debtor from amending under Rule 1009(a) where the debtor “waited over two years to propose” an amendment, which caused an unacceptable “degree of creditor prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arnold v. Gill (In Re Arnold)
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-16· cited 100×
• In Re Weissman
  N.D. Illinois· 1991-04-24· cited 13×
• In Re Myatt
  E.D. California· 1989-05-31· cited 13×
• Banc One, Texas, N.A. v. Braymer (In Re Braymer)
  N.D. Texas· 1991-05-03· cited 8×
• Szymanski v. Herzog (In Re Szymanski)
  N.D. Illinois· 1995-11-06· cited 6×
• Williams v. Giamanco (In Re Starr)
  S.D. Illinois· 1991-01-24· cited 5×
• In Re Romano
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-10-11· cited 5×