Skip to main content
· 8/16/2000

Arnold v. Gill (In Re Arnold)

Citations

  • 252 B.R. 778
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7332
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9795
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 951
  • 2000 WL 1234374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that bad faith and prejudice must be shown, at a minimum, by preponderance of the evidence, and potentially by clear and convincing evidence
  • acknowledging that disallowing amended exemptions based on bad faith or prejudice represents “judge-made exceptions”
  • acknowledging that disallowing amended exemptions based on bad faith or prejudice represents “judge-made exceptions”
  • stating prejudice requires that creditors “suffer an actual economic loss” as a result of the debtor's delay in claiming an exemption
  • conditioning allowance of amended exemption on payment of trustee's fees and costs in pursuing exempted cause of action
  • conditioning allowance of amended exemption on payment of trustee's fees and costs in pursuing exempted cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montali, Perris, Brandt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.