Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 10/11/2007

In Re Romano

Citations

  • 378 B.R. 454
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3571
  • 2007 WL 3027353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he preclusive effect of res judicata has been deemed relevant to 16 disputes involving objections to a debtor’s exemption claims.”
  • “The application 13 of res judicata . . . will not preclude a debtor from filing amended exemptions under Rule 14 1009(a), unless a final order denying an exemption claim for the same asset has previously 15 been entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruce Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.