· 5/22/1995
In Re James C. Napier
Citations
- 55 F.3d 610
- 34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1782
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11956
- 1995 WL 309727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the inherent teachings of a prior art reference is a question of fact
- question is whether prior art suggests the combination to a person with ordinary skill in the art
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Plager, Clevenger, Schall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.