Skip to main content
· 5/22/1995

In Re James C. Napier

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 610
  • 34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1782
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11956
  • 1995 WL 309727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the inherent teachings of a prior art reference is a question of fact
  • question is whether prior art suggests the combination to a person with ordinary skill in the art

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plager, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.