In re Zurko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o say that the missing step comes from the nature of the problem to be solved begs the question because the Board has failed to show that this problem had been previously identified anywhere in the prior art.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dickinson v. Zurko
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 997×
• In re Zurko
  Federal Circuit· 2001-08-02· cited 39×
• In re Zurko
  Federal Circuit· 1998-05-04· cited 18×
• In Re Mary E. Zurko, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. Lipner
  Federal Circuit· 1998-05-04· cited 2×
• In Re Mary E. Zurko, Thomas A. Casey, Jr., Morrie Gasser, Judith S. Hall, Clifford E. Kahn, Andrew H. Mason, Paul D. Sawyer, Leslie R. Kendall, and Steven B. Lipner
  Federal Circuit· 1997-04-15· cited 1×
• Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC
  D. Delaware· 2017-06-30· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1983-11-14· cited 366×
• Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.
  Federal Circuit· 1987-01-23· cited 238×
• In re Sponnoble
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1969-01-16· cited 41×
• In Re James C. Napier
  Federal Circuit· 1995-05-22· cited 40×
• In Re Graeme I. Bell, Leslie B. Rall and James P. Merryweather
  Federal Circuit· 1993-04-20· cited 30×
• In Re Andreas G. Kemps
  Federal Circuit· 1996-10-08· cited 18×