In Re James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “By failing to object to the sale, Roosevelt Bank implicitly conveyed its consent to the sale for purposes of satisfying section 363(f)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Roberts
  W.D. Michigan· 2000-05-22· cited 13×
• Canzano v. Ragosa (In Re Colarusso)
  D. Massachusetts· 2002-07-16· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Chung King, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Michael T. Nigro
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-01-18· cited 83×
• Citicorp Homeowners Services, Inc. v. Elliot (In Re Elliot)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-12-20· cited 24×
• In Re Heine
  D. South Dakota· 1992-05-15· cited 17×
• In Re Grand Slam U.S.A., Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1995-01-31· cited 11×
• In Re Shary
  N.D. Ohio· 1993-03-23· cited 10×
• In Re University Avenue Properties
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1986-01-03· cited 7×
• In Re Furst
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-02-07· cited 6×
• Electrical Ass'n of Missouri & Kansas v. Quality Hill Associates (In re Isis Foods, Inc.)
  W.D. Missouri· 1984-11-02· cited 1×