California Supreme Court· 9/17/1984
People v. Sumstine
Citations
- 687 P.2d 904
- 36 Cal. 3d 909
- 206 Cal. Rptr. 707
- 1984 Cal. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affording defendants in some circumstances the opportunity to collaterally attack a prior conviction that may be used to enhance a sentence imposed for a subsequent conviction
- affording defendants in some circumstances the opportunity to collaterally attack a prior conviction that may be used to enhance a sentence imposed for a subsequent conviction
- California law provides that the striking of an allegation of a prior conviction in a pending criminal proceeding does not preclude the use of the prior conviction in subsequent proceedings
- record must show on its face that a defendant was made aware of and waived certain constitutional rights in entering his or her guilty plea
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bird, Lucas, Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-04-29· cited 574×
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 477×
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-31· cited 374×
- People v. HomickCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-12-03· cited 323×
- Jesse Acosta-Huerta v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Men's ColonyNinth Circuit· 1992-01-23· cited 312×
- People v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-11· cited 240×
- People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-05-29· cited 180×
- People v. KurtzmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-08-18· cited 148×
- People v. TrujequeCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-05-28· cited 142×
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 131×
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 71×
- Curl v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-10· cited 58×
- People v. ToscanoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-11-22· cited 52×
- State v. OliverNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-01-13· cited 45×
- Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-01-09· cited 42×
- People v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-10-05· cited 42×
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-09-20· cited 42×
- In Re MossCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-12-18· cited 39×
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-08-30· cited 38×
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-28· cited 37×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-11-07· cited 953×
- In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-07· cited 335×
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-07-28· cited 249×
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-01-28· cited 225×
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-05-05· cited 157×
- In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-01-22· cited 146×
- In Re Ronald E.California Supreme Court· 1977-04-15· cited 136×
- People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-04-19· cited 133×
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-03-21· cited 130×
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-07-01· cited 118×
- In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-01-26· cited 115×
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-04-28· cited 111×
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-03· cited 107×
- In Re WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-02-14· cited 98×
- People v. ChesserCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-03-21· cited 95×
- In re LuceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-01-26· cited 65×
- In re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-01-26· cited 59×
- People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-09-13· cited 49×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-03-12· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.