Skip to main content

In Re Jacobs

Citations

  • 936 A.2d 1156
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 341
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under the then “new” Rule 229.2, “a trial court can deny an SSPA petition without holding a hearing if the petition does not contain factual allegations that support a finding that the transfer is in the petitioner’s best interest”
  • finding dicta from common pleas court decision “neither on point nor instructive”
  • describing Rule 208.1-4 as “the rules of civil procedure pertaining to motions practice”
  • allegation raised in statement of the questions presented but not addressed in the argument section of brief was waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Bowes, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.