California Supreme Court· 9/7/1979
People v. Ramirez
Citations
- 599 P.2d 622
- 25 Cal. 3d 260
- 158 Cal. Rptr. 316
- 1979 Cal. LEXIS 306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When an individual is subjected to the deprivatory governmental action he always has a due process liberty interest both in fair and unprejudiced decision making and in being treated with respect and dignity.”
- “the touchstone of due process is the protection of the individual against the arbitrary action of government”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bird, Mosk, Newman, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
159 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. DelgadilloCalifornia Supreme Court· 2022-12-19· cited 1,533×
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1986-09-30· cited 960×
- In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court· 1996-08-26· cited 603×
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-08-20· cited 577×
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-04-03· cited 524×
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Ben C.California Supreme Court· 2007-02-05· cited 430×
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-01· cited 256×
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-07-11· cited 223×
- In Re Malinda S.California Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 210×
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-08-21· cited 164×
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-01-29· cited 144×
- Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services v. Gregory C.California Supreme Court· 1996-08-26· cited 131×
- In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-05-26· cited 104×
- People v. NanceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-12-17· cited 101×
- Van Atta v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-07-03· cited 96×
- Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-10-22· cited 89×
- Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-01-29· cited 86×
- In re VicksCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-03-04· cited 84×
- Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-09-17· cited 80×
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-12-24· cited 74×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 3,014×
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 2,289×
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,017×
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court· 1978-03-01· cited 911×
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-12-30· cited 311×
- Mrs. Lola Hornsby v. Ivan Allen, Mayor of the City of AtlantaFifth Circuit· 1964-01-07· cited 260×
- People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-12-12· cited 256×
- People v. DisbrowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-02-06· cited 229×
- People v. PettingillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-05-09· cited 181×
- People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-11-20· cited 155×
- People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-01-27· cited 138×
- In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-03-07· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.