Skip to main content
D. Colorado· 10/10/1996

In re Intelcom Group, Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 169 F.R.D. 142
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15192
  • 1996 WL 588042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that factual differences in proposed class members’ claims should not result in a denial of class certification where common questions of law exist
  • stating that “factual differences in the claims of the individual putative class members should not result in a denial of class certification where common questions of law exist”
  • finding that the numerosity requirement of Rule 23(a) is satisfied where there were unspecified “thousands” of class members, and noting that the numerosity requirement generally is assumed to be met in suits involving nationally traded securities
  • “That the claims of individual putative class members may differ factually should not preclude certification under Rule 23(b)(2) of a claim seeking the application of a common policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daniel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.