In Re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Lit.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing plaintiffs claims “to the extent those claims are based on foreign conduct and foreign harm” but permitting claim for domestic antitrust injury to proceed
• “[T]he FTAIA prevents the Sherman Act from reaching such ‘ripple effects.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2010-03-28· cited 32×
• In Re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2007-08-15· cited 22×
• Boyd v. AWB LTD.
  S.D. New York· 2008-03-25· cited 11×
• Minn-Chem, Inc. v. Agrium Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-09-23· cited 4×
• Vanderklok v. United States
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-10-06· cited 4×
• In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2011-10-05· cited 2×
• In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-03-31· cited 2×
• Global Reinsurance Corporation-U.S. Branch v. Equitas Ltd.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-01-18· cited 2×
• Conopco, Inc. v. Arkema, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-03-31· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered Agent
  Third Circuit· 1993-06-30· cited 3,171×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2000-07-31· cited 1,230×
• Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1991-03-06· cited 1,043×
• United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
  Second Circuit· 1945-03-12· cited 1,016×
• Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 924×
• Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLC
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-07-17· cited 401×
• Sheila Gotha v. United States
  Third Circuit· 1997-05-28· cited 254×
• F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 212×
• Mortensen v. First Federal Savings And Loan Association
  First Circuit· 1977-01-20· cited 211×
• Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap as v. HeereMac Vof
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-02-26· cited 129×
• United States v. Lsl Biotechnologies Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. Lsl Plantscience Lcc
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-08-11· cited 56×
• Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffmann-Laroche, Ltd.
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-06-28· cited 30×
• Information Resources, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2001-02-06· cited 8×
• Optimum, S.A. v. Legent Corp.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-03-05· cited 4×
• Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2006-09-26· cited 2×