Minn-Chem, Inc. v. Agrium Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The FTAIA differentiates between conduct that ‘involves’ [import] commerce, and conduct that ‘directly, substantially, and foreseeably’ affects such commerce.”
• “[T]he allegations here amount to nothing more than what courts have termed a ‘ripple effect’ on the United States domestic market, and the FTAIA prevents the Sherman Act from reaching such ‘ripple effects.’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “To satisfy the requirements of Twombly and the FTAIA, the plaintiffs needed to provide enough factual content — that is, they needed to provide some factual description of the way in which prices in China, Brazil, and India serve as a ‘benchmark’ for American prices ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).