In re Ingram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no potential benefit [to creditors] in reopening” because “[C]hapter 13’s 60-month time limitation ha[d] long expired,” so the debtors could not “propose an amended, approvable plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa
  Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 1,364×
• Walter Burnes v. Pemco Aeroplex
  Eleventh Circuit· 2002-05-20· cited 314×
• Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Company, in Re Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins, Debtors
  Fourth Circuit· 1984-02-07· cited 137×
• Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,399 in the Matter of June M. Heath, Debtor. Joseph M. Black, Trustee v. United States Postal Service
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-06-10· cited 99×
• Rickey Carroll v. John Logan
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-10-28· cited 58×
• In Re Arana
  E.D. New York· 2011-09-22· cited 49×
• Apex Oil Co. v. Sparks (In Re Apex Oil Co.)
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-04-29· cited 45×
• In Re Danley
  D. New Mexico· 1981-10-08· cited 26×
• In Re Tarrer
  N.D. Georgia· 2001-10-01· cited 24×
• Joe Pliler v. Richard Stearns
  Fourth Circuit· 2014-03-28· cited 18×
• In Re Lee
  N.D. West Virginia· 2006-10-30· cited 15×
• Foreman v. J. Walter Construction Co. (In Re Foreman)
  S.D. Georgia· 2007-11-26· cited 13×
• In re James
  N.D. Georgia· 2013-02-19· cited 9×
• In RE McMELLON
  S.D. West Virginia· 2011-03-08· cited 4×
• Cotita v. Verizon Wireless
  W.D. Kentucky· 2014-09-18· cited 2×