Bachman v. Pelofsky (In Re Peterson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming refusal to award fee where “efforts resulted in no benefit to the debtor under § 330(a)(4)(B), other than to cause delay in payment.”
• affirming refusal to award fee where “efforts resulted in no benefit to the debtor under section 330(a)(4)(B), other than to cause delay in payment”
• affirming refusal to award fee where “efforts resulted in no benefit to the debtor under § 330(a)(4)(B), other than to cause delay in payment.”
• affirming refusal to award fee where “efforts resulted in no benefit to the debtor under § 330(a)(4)(B), other than to cause delay in payment.”
• affirming refusal to award fee where “efforts resulted in no benefit to the debtor under § 330(a)(4)(B), other than to cause delay in payment.”
• finding no abuse of discretion on the part of the bankruptcy court in reducing fees in a “fairly routine Chapter 13 case with few complexities” because counsel’s efforts “resulted in no benefit to the debtor under § 330(a)(4)(B), other than to cause a delay in payment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).