In re Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that changes of venue motivated by travel inconvenience should be infrequent because “[t]oday documents can be scanned and transmitted by email”
• discussing the changes to convenience analysis in “our age of advanced electronic communication”
• discussing the changes to convenience analysis in “our age of advanced electronic communication”
• “[W]itnesses can be deposed, examined, and cross-examined remotely and their videotaped testimony shown at trial.”
• “[W]itnesses can be deposed, examined, and cross-examined remotely and their videotaped testimony shown at trial.”
• “[W]itnesses can be deposed, examined, and cross-examined remotely and their videotaped testimony shown at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Defense Distributed v. Bruck
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-04-01· cited 172×
• Deb v. Sirva, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-08-11· cited 158×
• Ryze Claims Solutions, LLC v. Jane Magnus-Stinson
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-08-03· cited 119×
• George W. Mathias v. Michael M. Mihm
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-08-10· cited 32×
• Fletcher v. Doig
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-09-30· cited 12×
• Bowen v. Elanes New Hampshire Holdings, LLC
  D. Massachusetts· 2015-12-04· cited 8×
• Kapoor v. Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-10-23· cited 2×
• Ashoke Deb v. Sirva Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-08-11

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert
  Supreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
• Van Dusen v. Barrack
  Supreme Court· 1964-03-30· cited 3,077×
• Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
• Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
• Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
• In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-10-10· cited 1,830×
• Norwood v. Kirkpatrick
  Supreme Court· 1955-04-11· cited 752×
• Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-07-14· cited 482×
• Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 408×
• Research Automation, Inc. v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-11-23· cited 368×
• In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-04-27· cited 358×
• All States Freight, Inc. v. Modarelli
  Third Circuit· 1952-05-08· cited 143×
• In Re Apple, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-04-19· cited 130×
• In Re LimitNone, LLC
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-12-19· cited 77×
• Yao-Wen Chang v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-03-26· cited 75×
• In Re Factor Viii or Ix Concentrate Blood Products Litigation. Domenico Gullone v. Bayer Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-05-04· cited 58×
• U.S.O. Corp. v. Mizuho Holding Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-10-28· cited 42×
• In Re Atlantic Marine Construction Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-11-19· cited 22×
• In the Matter of William Hicks v. Jack R. Duckworth and Attorney General of Indiana
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-09-09· cited 18×