· 12/19/2008
In Re LimitNone, LLC
Citations
- 551 F.3d 572
- 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1309
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26955
- 2008 WL 5264359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “the Supreme Court has approved of addressing … venue before personal jurisdiction,” as long as the district court provides a “sound prudential justification”
- explaining that a court may transfer a case to a different venue without first considering the issue of subject matter jurisdiction
- denying petition for writ of mandamus from district court’s order transferring action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 without first deciding subject-matter jurisdiction
- denying petition for writ of mandamus from district court’s order transferring action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 without first deciding subject-matter jurisdiction
- applying Sinochem and holding that although Sinochem’s language speaks only to forum non conveniens dismissals, “§ 1404(a
- denying petition for writ of mandamus from district court’s order transferring action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 without first deciding subject-matter jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.