Skip to main content
· 12/19/2008

In Re LimitNone, LLC

Citations

  • 551 F.3d 572
  • 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1309
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26955
  • 2008 WL 5264359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “the Supreme Court has approved of addressing … venue before personal jurisdiction,” as long as the district court provides a “sound prudential justification”
  • explaining that a court may transfer a case to a different venue without first considering the issue of subject matter jurisdiction
  • denying petition for writ of mandamus from district court’s order transferring action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 without first deciding subject-matter jurisdiction
  • denying petition for writ of mandamus from district court’s order transferring action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 without first deciding subject-matter jurisdiction
  • applying Sinochem and holding that although Sinochem’s language speaks only to forum non conveniens dismissals, “§ 1404(a
  • denying petition for writ of mandamus from district court’s order transferring action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 without first deciding subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.