Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/13/2026

In re J.H.

Citations

2026 Ohio 1333

Syllabus

R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); Permanent Custody; Best Interest; Manifest Weight of the Evidence; Motion for Extension. The trial court's decision granting the Agency permanent custody was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying mother-appellant's motion for an extension.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Santosky v. Kramer
Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
Stanley v. Illinois
Supreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
Meyer v. Nebraska
Supreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
In re Murray
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
In re Estate of Haynes
Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-07-23· cited 380×
In Re B.C.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
In re R.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-14· cited 86×
In re K.M.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-17· cited 49×
In re H.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-03· cited 48×
In re N.R.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-16· cited 48×
In re A.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-19· cited 43×
In re Y.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-12· cited 24×
In re S.D.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-26· cited 12×
In re Dn.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-21· cited 12×
In re H.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-11· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.