In re Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the itemization must be sufficiently detailed and state with particularity the amounts that remain unpaid
• an inaccurate response under Rule 3002.1(g) \complies with neither the letter nor the spirit\ of the rule
• deeming mortgage current did not constitute “other appropriate relief’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Casamatta v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (In re Freeman-Clay)
  W.D. Missouri· 2017-09-01· cited 12×
• In re Morris
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2019-05-15· cited 3×
• In re Snow
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2019-05-09· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Tollios
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-05-13· cited 10×
• In Re Carr
  E.D. Virginia· 2012-03-19· cited 7×
• Kreidler v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. (In re Kreidler)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-03-29· cited 5×
• Ogden v. PNC Bank, N.A. (In re Ogden)
  D. Colorado· 2014-04-03· cited 2×
• In re Nieves
  D. Puerto Rico· 2013-09-25· cited 1×