In Re Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the “considerable problems” caused by home mortgages and post-petition fees
• “The creditor must respond to that notice [of final cure payment] by acknowledging that it is correct, or if it is not correct, stating with particularity the amounts that remain unpaid.” (emphasis added)
• “The purpose of Rule 3002.1 was to provide a prompt, efficient, and cost-effective means to determine whether there is a question as to the status of a debtor’s home loan at the conclusion of the [C]hapter 23 13 case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Howard
  N.D. California· 2016-06-01· cited 10×
• In re Weigel
  E.D. Virginia· 2012-12-06· cited 3×
• In re Nieves
  D. Puerto Rico· 2013-09-25· cited 1×
• In Re: Gravel
  Second Circuit· 2021-08-02