In re Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Madison, 337 B.R. 99, was “decided prior to the addition of Rule 3002.1 to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure in 2011”
• despite it being the debtor filing a motion for determination of the mortgage payment, it is the creditor who has access to the information concerning the mortgage and therefore the creditor bears the burden of proving entitlement to the charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
  Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
• Ramos v. Lamm
  Tenth Circuit· 1983-06-15· cited 753×
• State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma City
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1979-07-24· cited 355×
• Robinson v. City of Edmond
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-11-06· cited 338×
• Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC
  Supreme Court· 2015-06-15· cited 308×
• Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-05-03· cited 280×
• Jane L. v. Bangerter
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-08-02· cited 181×
• Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2007-10-09· cited 98×
• Cadena v. Pacesetter Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-09-12· cited 95×
• Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-02-26· cited 86×
• Hamilton v. Boise Cascade Express
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-03-20· cited 83×
• Whitehorse v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2007-02-27· cited 77×
• In Re Banks
  N.D. Alabama· 1982-12-30· cited 30×
• In Re Madison
  N.D. Mississippi· 2006-01-05· cited 18×
• In re Tollios
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-05-13· cited 10×
• In re Howard
  N.D. California· 2016-06-01· cited 10×
• In re Brumley
  W.D. Michigan· 2017-07-24· cited 8×
• In re England
  M.D. Alabama· 2018-03-30· cited 7×
• Usrey v. Wilson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-11-01· cited 4×
• In re Mandeville
  N.D. Alabama· 2019-01-28· cited 3×