N.D. Indiana· 10/31/2012
In re Hight-Goodspeed
Citations
- 486 B.R. 462
- 2012 WL 7189303
- 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 6063
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing examples of where courts have interpreted the phrase “the value, as of the effective date of the property” in other sections of the Bankruptcy Code to include interest
- In this court's opinion, the meaning of those words is not changed by relocating the phrase ‘as of the effective date of the plan.’
- “In this court’s opinion, the meaning of those words is not changed by relocating the phrase “as of the effective date of the plan.”
- “Since interest represents the time value of money and compensation for the risk of default . . . the court sees nothing untoward with such a result.”
- requiring the payment of interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 2,564×
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 2,368×
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 631×
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court· 1997-06-16· cited 471×
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 431×
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 381×
- In Re Dorothy C. Hardy, Debtor. Dorothy C. Hardy v. Cinco Federal Credit UnionSixth Circuit· 1985-02-19· cited 45×
- Melvin and Bonnie Koopmans v. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America, AcaSeventh Circuit· 1996-12-10· cited 29×
- In the Matter of Burgess Wholesale Mfg. Opticians, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of United States of AmericaSeventh Circuit· 1983-11-30· cited 21×
- Airadigm Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-29· cited 18×
- In Re RheinE.D. Michigan· 1987-03-04· cited 18×
- In Re RossN.D. Illinois· 2007-09-13· cited 13×
- In Re RichallD. New Hampshire· 2012-05-11· cited 13×
- Matter of EatonS.D. Iowa· 1991-07-15· cited 11×
- In Re Stewart-HarrelN.D. Georgia· 2011-01-25· cited 10×
- DeHart v. Parke (Parke)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-06-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.