In re Edward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Putting the phrase ‘as of the effective date of the plan’ before both (A) and (B) of Section 1325(b)(1) has the effect of making the phrase applicable to both subsections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re Gillen
  C.D. Illinois· 2017-05-19· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-11· cited 410×
• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• In Re Stewart-Harrel
  N.D. Georgia· 2011-01-25· cited 10×
• In Re Paul Kun, AKA Pal Kun, Debtor. James L. Hodge and Sue P. Hodge, AKA Oma Suzanne Hodge, Husband and Wife v. Paul Kun, AKA Pal Kun
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-02-27· cited 9×
• In re Hight-Goodspeed
  N.D. Indiana· 2012-10-31· cited 7×