Skip to main content

In re Hawver (

Citations

  • 300 Kan. 1023
  • 339 P.3d 573
  • 2014 WL 5899646
  • 2014 Kan. LEXIS 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding lawyer retained no First Amendment interest in statements made to jury on behalf of client, and discipline could be imposed for statements' failure to meet standard of competence required by KRPC 1.1
  • stating that the attorney's incompetent representation of his client, which resulted in the retrial of a capital murder case, was a significant prejudice to the administration of justice in violation of Kansas's version of RPC 8.4(d)
  • finding document attached to Hawver's brief \is not properly before this court because it is not part of the record\ as required by Supreme Court Rule 6.02[b] [2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 35]
  • disbarring trial counsel due to his performance in Amman Reu-El's trial
  • 'document attached to Hawver's brief is not properly before this court because it is not part of the record' as required by Rule 6.02[b]'
  • respondent's argument deemed abandoned or waived if respondent's brief advances argument without proper citation to the record to support that claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Hill, Malone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re Hawver (

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.