United States v. Robert E. Nolen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights must be weighed when revoking pro hac vice admission of a criminal defendant’s counsel
• holding that an unpreserved challenge to a restitution order is reviewed de novo
• remanding to the district court “specifically for it to conduct and verbalize the necessary balancing analysis” before denying pro hac vice status
• reversing district court’s revocation of out-of-state defense counsel’s pro hac vice admission because court failed to balance defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights against interests underlying ethics rules violated by defense counsel
• reversing district court's revocation of out-of-state defense counsel's pro hac vice admission because court failed to balance defendant's Sixth Amendment rights against interests underlying ethics rules violated by defense counsel
• “Courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who may practice before them and to regulate the conduct of those who do.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).