In re Harmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “That the references would have suggested doing what appellant has done to anyone skilled in the art seems beyond doubt since both references relate to coating ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Teleflex Inc. v. KSR International Co.
  E.D. Michigan· 2003-12-12· cited 8×
• Frank W. Butler and Catalina Yachts, Inc., a California Corporation v. Jack A. Helms, D/B/A Jack A. Helms Company
  Fourth Circuit· 1977-01-26· cited 6×
• Rota-Carb Corp. v. Frye Manufacturing Co.
  S.D. Iowa· 1961-07-18· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kropa v. Robie
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1951-02-06· cited 106×
• In Re Fridolph
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1943-03-01· cited 30×
• In re Delancey
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1949-09-30· cited 17×
• In re Mariani
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1949-09-30· cited 7×