Customs and Patent Appeals· 9/30/1949
In re Mariani
Citations
- 37 C.C.P.A. 740
- 177 F.2d 293
- 83 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 308
- 1949 CCPA LEXIS 345
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he gravamen of the allegations of error . . . is that both [prior art] patents are in fields of art not analogous to the field of appellant’s application.” (em- phasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connell, Garrett, Jackson, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanySixth Circuit· 1964-05-14· cited 113×
- Application of Roy A. GroutCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-05-25· cited 14×
- Application of Marvin C. Van Wanderham, Warren W. Worthley and Carl R. ComolliCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-06-15· cited 6×
- Application of Bernard HarmonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-05-25· cited 3×
- Metaframe Corporation v. Biozonics CorporationD. Massachusetts· 1972-12-07· cited 3×
- In re HarmonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-05-25· cited 3×
- Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Federal Circuit· 2023-05-09· cited 3×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.